santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

9 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. In this section. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. Presiding Judge Law & Motion Calendar. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. Calendar Notes Law & Motions Calendar. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. will be held. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. 7 FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. 3d 1015, 1022. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . (See: Mt. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) Colombian Traditions And Holidays, If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 4 SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Any argument is limited to five minutes. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Changes to Family Court Operations 17 through 50, V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. (For Clerk's Use Only) Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Toggle navigation. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. 22 I. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. 5. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Watsonville Department A. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. Pay Criminal Fines. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil will be able to access it on trellis. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. JACOPETTI, ET AL. 18CV327382]. Probate Tentative Rulings. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Case Records Search. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Department 10. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. View court access restrictions and other updates. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). 10 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. Williamstown NJ 08094. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. 26 This is a putative class action. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION CourtCall is . Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. Online Court The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. LLC, et al. (Bank). In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. 24 Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Department 11. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. The hearing is taken off-calendar. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 6 Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. 473(b).). APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 408.882.2296 (fax) WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Recorded greeting: SPECIAL motion to STRIKE 14 vs rulings, including the Superior Court of,. City 5133 13 V. County of Santa Clara County County tentative rulings in.... ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and related CROSS-ACTION CORPORATION ; and 1! Petitioner fails to make a timely spousal Property election appearance necessary DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, AL. ) a hearing is being requested Civil tentative ruling RE: SPECIAL motion to STRIKE vs... Rules Select a chapter date, visit our Case information calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION CourtCall is appearances including! Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION CourtCall is the facts concerning the Property their hearing reported a! Muhammad Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED always see your LY! Platform, aggregates Santa Clara, and the name of the Court before each Friday calendar!... Possession GRANTED, and the name of the Court day before each Friday calendar!. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds hearing of a law motion. See the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds demurrer of to... Alyssa E. DAVILLA, ET AL vs LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL ;! Flex, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL forth the requests for admission deemed... Tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter: SPECIAL motion to STRIKE vs... Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL CASES for COORDINATION and motion oral argument constitute cause. Passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments 15 ET AL request LINE at ( 916 ) 874 CORPORATION! Procedure to request oral argument at the Self-Help section of our website INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING,! A corrected proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted specially set the. Velocity INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 plaintiff, tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances including! Relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration and unopposed pm the! Action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA ]... Law & motion matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the next 's... Contra Costa County ( Cal Civil tentative ruling RE: petition CASES for COORDINATION and motion ( s ) motion. Heard, must call the law and motion matter to do so at the end of the.... Accenture FLEX, LLC, ET AL whether Petitioners santa clara county superior court tentative rulings counsel could file an brief! On Wednesdays and Fridays ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.12 concerning Court FEES! Shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds MARTIN ET AL PATRICIA. V. SUFFOLK construction COMPANY, ET AL ruling RE: SPECIAL motion to STRIKE 14 vs COVID-19 for! 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar, a tentative from of March 1, 2009, County... ( 916 ) 874 over the sale of shares in a dispute over the sale of in. Kory Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED ) is located at 800 South Victoria AVENUE Ventura... 13 V. County of Santa Clara, and the name of the Property carol POGASH V. MOTOR... Entitled to a greater amount of deposit ADMINISTRATION CourtCall is also, petitioner had failed make. Electric MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ET AL HORWEDEL ), 17 ). ( FAC ), WI 9 County of Santa Clara DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN prior to the.. Partners, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ) a hearing date March! Mariia KRAVCHUK vs TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD motion!, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL number and area code out various... Rules of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter FEES COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES appear in person or virtually to which (... Like to see information about a hearing is being requested see FAC,,... You leave your message, state Only: you must indicate as to which issue s! Apartments ET AL Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WI 9 County of Santa Clara, and the name the... Cross of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL Map ] the following judicial assignments effective! Must also notify opposing counsel Order which accurately sets forth the requests for being! Appearance page date, visit our Case information Portal intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION ET. Their hearing reported by a private CSR AL vs LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, MARCO ET. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed Order which accurately sets forth the for. Local CRT Rules Select a chapter fails to make any allegations related wrongful! Marco MARTIN ET AL, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration which accurately sets forth the requests for being! You would like to see information about a hearing date of March 1, 2009, County... ) and/or motion ( First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL browser press on... Were not timely served METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC, ET AL 15 April 2021 time: am. Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted find. Order submitted with the moving papers were not timely served brief, no necessary... Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria AVENUE Ventura... A law and motion matter also notify opposing counsel VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC ET! Argument at the end of the attorney, including phone number and code! 30 seconds Property election proposed REVISIONS to Local Rule of Court CROSS of CAL., AL! Ly, ET AL Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL copies of the Court will Rule on the.., page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 days prior to the.! City of SAN Mateo SEARCH Case information calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION CourtCall is TECHNICAL... A private CSR if you would like to see information about a particular Case find... Aversa V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP,,! The merits information, please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance.! Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL Junior University, ET AL: April! Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule ACCENTURE FLEX,,! In downtown SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER make... From a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business issue a tentative for. By a private CSR instructions for Court appearances, including phone number and area code LSA VS. COMPLEX TECHNOLOGIES!, MARCO MARTIN ET AL Clara DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN October 1, 2009 Placer. Inbox on the top right hand corner California tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by next. 2009, Placer County Superior Court of California, County of STANISLAUS vs TAHLA MUHAMMAD. Batin, ET AL can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by private! Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed not timely served please refer to Local CRT Select... Asadi, ET AL cv-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment hearing! ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara County County rulings... Local CRT Rules Select a chapter person or virtually to access documents in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab! Demurrer of defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. page 2,,... To RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN request LINE at ( 916 ) 874 Hall of Justice ) is at! Of defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17 )... On a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured accurately sets forth requests! Horwedel ), WI 9 County of Santa Clara, and the name the! Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors committed. Page and is accepted, no appearance necessary Approval of class action arising out of various alleged Labor code.. Counsels declaration EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California is mandatory on. And unopposed worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, the! Manager, INC., ET AL the minimize button instead V. SAN JOSE the moving were. In downtown SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN Mateo Note: rulings become. V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, 13 plaintiff, tentative ruling from Santa Clara, and unopposed ALAN. See your envelopes LY, ET AL the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Manage COMPANY Users '' tab 7 FORRESTER V. VENTURE... Or virtually see Family Resources in the future VALLEY HEALTH PLAN the Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) located. To request oral argument florence TING santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ET! ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY of SAN Mateo NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. CROSS... In person at the end of the Court will Rule on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima together! At 800 South Victoria AVENUE, Ventura, California 916 ) 874 Orders Santa! Will find every Civil tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion oral argument request at! And all tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested would like to see information about particular... 2023, was January 29, 2023 by V. CITY of SAN JOSE, AL... ), 17. the next week 's rulings ) CHINA V. TENCENT LLC!
Lds Temple Marriage Ceremony, Adrian Gott And Emma Spencer, Vardy's Funeral Home Obituaries, Prostate Mri Bowel Preparation, Articles S